MAPSERVER MAPCACHE FREE DOWNLOAD

You can see that the sqlite version is almost 4 times slower, the only difference is that the disk is served over http and the sqlite over https. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. In reply to this post by Sebastiano Laini I seeded the first 4 zoom level of the sqlite cache. Still it redirect you to that link, and btw it seems that mapcache can be used also as a fastCGI. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Do you guess that fastcgi woud make SQLite cache faster?

Uploader:	Keran
Date Added:	6 October 2013
File Size:	43.51 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	13207
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

For general or urgent enquiries please write to: Sorry, MapCache documentation has link to that page as well. MapCache is documented here: The SQLite based caches are a bit slower than the disk based caches, and may have write-locking issues at seed time if a high number of threads all try to insert new tiles concurrently. Tonight I will let it seed the whole area.

MapCacheOpenLayers – MS4W

You wrote that SQLite cache is very slow for you which makes me think that there is something sub-optimal in your installation. Could you explain your plan with some more details? The FastCGI build is less tested, and may lag behind the Apache module version on some minor details.

It seems that using mapcache as fastCGI over apache modules it that should improve speed also. Bear in mind that the disk version is accessed over 80 website every day so there are people there all day while the sqlite you will be the only one as is setup just for test at mapservre moment. How can I install it in CentOS 7?

Configuring MS4W and MapCache for use in OpenLayers

I seeded the first 4 zoom level of the sqlite cache. And then instead of http: Do you guess that fastcgi woud make SQLite cache faster?

It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. That documentation is about Mapserver, Mapcache is another software. My guess is this is related to how mapcache structures the transaction and inserts into the sqlitedb. In this comparison the differences were rather small http: In reply to this post by Sebastiano Laini I seeded the mwpserver 4 zoom level of the sqlite cache.

Can you give metrics about the difference in speed? Note that the overhead of FastCGI is non-negligible with respect to the throughput you may obtain with a native Apache module.

MapCache — MapServer documentation

First thing to check is if the SQLite database is on a fast disk. Any unauthorised disclosure or copying is prohibited and my be unlawful. In which way does the slowness mapesrver Is it when seeding or when serving from a pre-seeded cache? In reply to this post by Sebastiano Laini Sorry, MapCache documentation has link to that page as well.

Search everywhere only in this topic. In reply to this post by Sebastiano Laini. FastCGI is a protocol for keeping cgi-bin style web applications running as a daemon to take advantage of preserving memory caches, and amortizing other high startup costs like heavy database connections over many requests. On Wed, 17 Oct at Free forum by Nabble. Rahkonen Jukka MML [mailto: What I do not understand is what you are going to reach by running Mapcache as fastcgi instead of running it as Apache module which should be the faster option, and if this has some connection with the SQLite cache vs.

Well, for what I can read in the documentation of mapserver: You can compare them from 5km to m the scale in the bottom rightthe rest is not cached. You can see that the sqlite version is almost 4 times slower, the only difference is that the disk is served over http and the sqlite over https.